Sunday, July 4, 2010

Science and Ideology

-
Roanoke Times, 7-4-10, Pg Horiz 1: Not blinded by science, but ideology.
-
The author, Chris Mooney, unsuccessfully tries to make the point that the public is not responding to the scientific community on “selected subjects” because they are either ignorant or ideologs who have an economic or political agenda.
The author further opines that the most egregious nonbelievers are college educated conservatives. His primary example of his political thesis is those really bad global warming Skeptic people.
-
The author clearly doesn’t comprehend that real educated people are Critical Thinkers who are by definition Skeptics! On the other hand, those other educated people who just regurgitate the pabulum offered by many liberal college professors are programmed to repeat back and accept the material served up by the “all knowing” media and so called “experts by consensus.”
-
Perhaps the 30,000+ signers of the Petition Project: http://www.petitionproject.org/
who represent all sectors of science and engineering aren’t ideologs but are instead educated Skeptics who understand earth science, the long-term variability of earths climate and who differentiate between global warming, the effects of greenhouse gases and human activities. Perhaps they are not prone to jump on a “consensus bandwagon” but instead question the real science available from all sources and also question why none of the Alarmists will engage in meaningful technical debate.
The debate forums are available from organizations like Heartland Institute at:
http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org/index.html
-
A key statement included: “the scientists often fail to realize that a more scientifically informed public is not necessarily a public that will more frequently side with scientists.”
Image that! Educated people questioning the thesis being proposed by scientists!
Just how arrogant can this author and his scientific associates be? Apparently things are better for them when there is a population covered by a blanket of ignorance and superstition standing ready to buy the alchemists gold or the medicine man’s elixir.
-
Instead of lamenting and trying to marginalize the Skeptics, why not engage them in open and fair debate on the scientific facts and the uncertainty of the hypothesis of man-made global warming.
-
How trusting can the “common man” be when even Jon Stewart points out the total lack of creditability and professionalism of the Alarmists?
http://www.roanokeslant.org/ClimateGate/ClimateGate.swf
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2010/05/challenging-global-warming-alarmists.html
-
http://www.roanokeslant.org/GlobalWarmingThoughts/
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2010/06/more-climategate-doublespeak.html
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2010/05/hypocrisy-of-uva-faculty.html
-

No comments:

Post a Comment