
However, dodgy plot-holes that you could steer the TITANIC through are nothing new in the world of comics; plots are usually (or used to be) just an excuse to get the heroes together for a fight - before they realize their mistake, become the best of pals, and then team up and rush off to confront the villains. In an age when comics were primarily aimed at kids, logical, intricately thought-out plots were hardly considered a necessity, and, as long as events galloped along at an exciting, rip-roaring pace, it's unlikely that readers ever dwelt on (or even noticed) deficiencies in the details.
Take FANTASTIC FOUR #1 for example. Allegedly the greatest brain on the planet, REED RICHARDS decides to take a rocket into space - KNOWING that it doesn't have sufficient shielding to keep out cosmic rays. What's more, he decides to drag along his fiancee and her kid brother - who presumably would be as much use as a fart in a spacesuit when it came to piloting the ship. Talk about irresponsible?
But there are even more howlers than you can shake a stick at. Are secret rocket bases so negligently guarded that four people could 'sneak past the guards', gain access to the rocket, and then take off without the assistance of the ground-based launch crew which would be required to accomplish lift-off? Well, in the world of four-colour comics it seems anything is possible.

Sure! The FOUR aliens who are impersonating the FOUR humans and are likely to be hiding out together in a group of FOUR. For the 'plan' to succeed, the alien impersonating Johnny would have to be absent from the group at just the right time, and what are the chances of that happening? As a plan it falls far short of even being half-@ssed, but - can you believe it? Reed Richards - the greatest mind on Earth, remember - actually approves it. (And, astoundingly - to say nothing of preposterously - it actually happens that way in the comic.) Is it only me, or does anyone else think Reed is a bit of a dipstick?

One can multiply examples of this kind a thousandfold with the application of a little thought when reading these bygone classics of yesteryear. However, perhaps I'm being a little harsh. These stories were intended to be read by undemanding kids who were only interested in action, adventure and excitement - logic was never part of the package and it hardly seemed to matter as long as the story thrilled and entertained its young readership.
Remember, we're talking about 'long-underwear characters' - absurdity is inherent in the basic premise from the get-go. So, next time you're reading your favourite comic, don't get hung up on the details - just enjoy it for what it is. Unless, that is, it takes itself so seriously that the writer deserves a slap on the head if you ever run into him. (And, if so, give him a slap for me.)
No comments:
Post a Comment