Roanoke Times, 3-20-10, Pg 10: 2 groups fume as Va disputes EPA proposal.
-
No, that’s not the story! The story is that: Fourteen States are in Rebellion against the Obama administration; there were only eleven in Rebellion in the War Between The States and they were in rebellion for the same reason as today’s group.
-
The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) of the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. The Tenth Amendment restates the Constitution's principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the national government nor prohibited to the states by the constitution of the United States are reserved to the states or the people.
-
It’s unbelievable that after the revelations of malfeasance and corruption exposed in:
ClimateGate, GlacierGate, OzoneGate, BinLadenGate, AfricaGate, DutchGate, IndiaGate, WaterVaporGate and TemperatureRecorderGate:
That Obama would have his EPA proceed with CO2 actions and also have Pelosi and Reid proceed with Cap&Tax legislation without a complete open and transparent review of the facts associated with our 250 years of natural global warming.
Why let science get in the way of politics?
-
Has Obama’s team not comprehended the ClimateGatePlus facts and the IPCC and other government’s reaction to those facts and the world-wide discrediting of the alarmist cabal and the universal call for a total in-depth review of the real facts?
The following is required reading by all who have an interest in this subject:
-
*************************
-
The American Chemical Society Public Policy Statement On Climate Change:
-
An Open Letter to Board of Directors of the American Chemical Society
Signed by over 150 past and current members of the Society
-
As chemists and engineers who are familiar with the science issues, and as current and past members of the American Chemical Society, we the undersigned urge the ACS Board of Directors to appoint a group of senior scientists, without vested interest, to revisit the science behind climate change in light of new scientific findings instead of relying on the report of the IPCC.
-
This group would share their conclusions with the members of the ACS in open forums, discussions and submit majority and minority reports (if so needed) to revise the current statement of the ACS on climate change. As counterpoint to the current statement, we recommend the change to as follows, so as to more accurately represent the current state of the science:
-
Greenhouse gas emissions, such as water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, accompany human industrial and agricultural activity. While substantial concern has been expressed that emissions may cause significant climate change, measured or reconstructed temperature records indicate that 20th -21st century changes are neither exceptional nor persistent, and the historical and geological records show many periods warmer than today. In addition, there is an extensive scientific literature that examines beneficial effects of increased levels of carbon dioxide for both plants and animals.
-
Studies of a variety of natural processes, including ocean cycles and solar variability, indicate that they can account for variations in the Earth’s climate on the time scale of decades and centuries. Current climate models appear insufficiently reliable to properly account for natural and anthropogenic contributions to past climate change, much less project future climate.
-
The American Chemical Society supports an objective scientific effort to understand the effects of all processes – natural and human -- on the Earth’s climate and the biosphere’s response to climatic processes. The Society promotes technological options for meeting environmental challenges, regardless of cause.
-
We also are willing to accept a new statement that is based on the independent assessment being requested.
-
Due diligence by the ACS Board of Directors on this issue is timely and important given the discovery of substantial scientific misconduct by senior practitioners of climate science and IPCC members, both in the UK and US which were uncovered in the past few weeks.
-
***************************
-
For a very understandable summary of a description outlining why:
Carbon Dioxide Unlikely to Cause Higher Temperatures -- read:
MARTIN MANGINO TIMES-DISPATCH GUEST COLUMNIST
Published: March 14, 2010
http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/opinion/commentary/article/ED-MANG14_20100312-204009/330040/
-
See The Prior Items for more details:
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2010/03/climate-change-not-for-some-birds.html
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2010/03/gores-water-retention-problem.html
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2010/02/roanoke-times-global-warming-omissions.html
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2010/02/roanoke-times-global-warming-double.html
-
For a summary of our 250 years of natural global warming click:
http://www.roanokeslant.org/GlobalWarmingThoughts/
-
No comments:
Post a Comment