ClimateGate 2.0

-
Yet another batch of Alarmist Emails that further erode the public’s view of the pseudo-scientists promoting the Gore and Socialist agendas.
-
First it was the temperature, then it was the climate, then it was the sea levels and now its bad storms and nasty weather. All these things and more are being displayed on a “wheel of alarm” that gets spun at every left-wing media opportunity.
-
And once again UVAs Mann and his associate Jones from ClimateGate 1.0 are exposed as Alarmist-operatives instead of professional scientists; for example:
“Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden,” Jones writes in another newly released email. “I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/11/23/climategate-2-0-new-e-mails-rock-the-global-warming-debate/
-
Is this indicative of the work of serious scientists and our government employees upon which we should be changing our entire energy systems to an intermittent, expensive and unproven alternative?
-
Forbes  11-16-11   Chilling Thoughts For Global-Warming Alarmists

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2011/1205/opinions-capital-flows-global-warming-alarmists-james-taylor.html
-
The WSJ’s Climategate 2.0 by J. Delingpole describes the unprofessional communications between Alarmists, the UN’s IPCC and selected US Representatives.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204452104577059830626002226.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
-
Washington Times EDITORIAL: A climate of fraud
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/29/a-climate-of-fraud/
-
Forbes OpEd 11-23-11  Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/11/23/climategate-2-0-new-e-mails-rock-the-global-warming-debate/
-
-
The unprofessional and unethical behavior of the IPCC and Alarmists, all of whom are primarily funded by taxpayers, stands in stark contrast to Paul Allen's institute for Brain Science funded by private and corporate money.
The WSJ,  OPINION, NOVEMBER 30, 2011.Why We Chose 'Open Science' By Paul Allen cofounder of MicroSoft.  To accelerate research breakthroughs on brain diseases, the Allen Institute puts all its data online for use without fees..
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204630904577058162033028028.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
-
-
The most disturbing of all this activity is the one-world socialist agenda of wealth-redistribution and retribution. The Medieval Warm Period was good to the least of societies people, and the Little Ice Age was very bad for them. All this happened without any contribution by any bad Americans and Al Gore and his charlatan friends weren't there to make millions of dollars exploiting natures ever changing climate and weather and environments.
-
Apparently many "Greenies" are like watermelon's: green on the outside, pink on the inside.
-
Global Warming Alarmist Still Co-opting 1984 DoubleSpeak
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2011/10/global-warming-alarmist-still-co-opting.html
-
The Medias Hypocrisy of “The Carbon Footprint”
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2011/10/roanoke-times-not-getting-into-green.html
-
How I became a Skeptic, and why I still am:
http://www.roanokeslant.org/AGW-Skeptic/
-