CAN COMICS HAVE A HARMFUL INFLUENCE?



Harmless fun - or harmful influence?

Notice I ask "can" - not "do". There's an obvious reason for this subtle but important distinction, so I needn't elaborate. However, perhaps it's the wrong question - it's a bit like the old saying, "Guns don't kill people - people do", in that it's not so much the medium which can be potentially harmful, but the content.

Whether it be movies, books, magazines, records, television, comics - or even newspapers, if inappropriate content is made available to minors, or anyone for which it isn't suitable, then it's likely to have some kind of negative effect on those who are exposed to it. Will it make someone pick up a gun or a knife and go on a killing spree? Will it turn someone into a sex pervert or even a rapist? Well, that's not quite what I'm suggesting, so let's not get carried away with ourselves.

Of course, there are those who dogmatically claim both those extremes. Some say definitely yes, others give a resounding no. For myself, I prefer to allow for the possibility that certain comics - in the same way that certain movies, video games, records, etc. - could be PART of the problem we face in the ever-increasing hedonistic, materialistic, sexualized and violent society we live in today. Notice that I said "part" - I'm not one of the so-called "anti-comic brigade" castigated by those who feel that comics are exclusively and uniquely beyond the possibility of having any kind of negative effect on their readers. 

Consider the influence that society and the culture we live in can have on us. Muslim cultures tend to produce Muslims; Catholic cultures tend to produce Catholics. Once upon a time, cannibalistic cultures produced cannibals. And you can multiply the examples many times over. It's a simple case of cause and effect. (And I should here add that I'm not equating either Muslims or Catholics with cannibals.) If we live in a culture which embraces a steady diet of murder, sadism, rape, violence, promiscuity, criminal activity, coarse language, blasphemy, etc., through all forms of entertainment (and that includes comics), is it any wonder that - as a society - we become inured to it all, to varying degrees?

Sure, most kids know the difference between fantasy and reality, and I'm not claiming that someone watching a violent video game (or reading a violent comic) is going to turn out a maniacal murderer because of it. (Although I'm also not saying that it COULDN'T happen - in extreme circumstances and in conjunction with other factors.) However, doesn't the fact that millions of kids regularly view ultra-violent video games without flinching at explicit scenes of mutilation, mayhem and murder for the purpose of ENTERTAINMENT - and see nothing wrong with it (and some might argue that this fact in itself is evidence of harm) - not perturb you in the slightest? Wouldn't you concede that this is perhaps an example of the harmful and negative effects that certain aspects of popular culture can have?

When it comes down to it, inappropriate content is inappropriate content, regardless of whatever format it's presented in. If it's material which could have a harmful or negative effect on its audience, then it doesn't much matter whether it comes in the form of a book, a movie - or a comic. The danger is in the content - not the carton. That's why, to me, those that assert that comics couldn't ever have - and haven't ever had - any kind of negative influence on any reader, are not on as secure ground as they might think. The simple truth is - nothing's ever that simple.   

One thing I DO know - while the question is at least being asked, discussed and debated, the chances of things getting out of control are kept in check to some degree. It's when we forget to be vigilant about the possibilities of declining standards in what is being disseminated amongst our young that we are most at risk from the ills which may infect our culture.

Feel free to give me your views on the matter.

(FOOTNOTE: The above BUSTER COMIC LIBRARY issue was pulled from distribution at the last moment because of fears that some children may get the idea (even subconsciously) that it was okay to hold lighted fireworks. It would be naive to dismiss the notion that there weren't also concerns about IPC being sued if some kid got hurt following Buster's example, but the primary motivation was out of genuine consideration for children's physical safety. Shouldn't we also be as concerned about the possible psychological effect some comics may have? Incidentally, I Googled "violent comic images" to reference illustrations for possible inclusion - most were of a sexual nature and far too inappropriate to use.)